CBCA 2593

AERO Union Corporation

Aug 22, 2013Judge VergilioDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Not published in the listingDismissed on other grounds

Key Facts

Appellant
AERO Union Corporation
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 2593
Decided
Aug 22, 2013The decision states Aug 22, 2013 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Dismissed on other grounds
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from that line, because the decision's text states no operative ruling we could isolate. No model is involved.

Topics

Termination for defaultProcedure and sanctions

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Gerard J. Leimkuhler
Berwyn Capital Interests
Berwyn, PA
For the respondent
Elin M. Dugan
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
San Francisco, CA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,417 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Aug 22, 2013 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: August 22, 2013

CBCA 2593

AERO UNION CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Gerard J. Leimkuhler, Managing Partner of Berwyn Capital Interests, Berwyn, PA, appearing for Appellant.

Elin M. Dugan, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.

Before Board Judges VERGILIO, GOODMAN, and SHERIDAN.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

On October 14, 2012, the Board received a notice of appeal from Aero Union Corporation (contractor) disputing the termination for default of its contract, AG-024B-C-08-9277, with the Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (agency), under which the contractor had provided aircraft for use in fighting forest fires. With a hearing on the merits set and the date for the submission of pre-hearing briefs and witness and exhibit lists passed, the contractor provided notice that because it lacks resources it does not intend further to pursue the appeal. The agency has filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice based upon the contractor’s failure to prosecute. The contractor opted to file no response.

Because the contractor is not pursuing the appeal, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

______________________________

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

We concur:

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

PATRICIA J. SHERIDAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in AERO Union Corporation, CBCA 2593. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.