CBCA 2797

Mid-Hudson Properties

Nov 2, 2012Judge McCannGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Mid-Hudson Properties
Respondent agency
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Judge
McCann
Case number
CBCA 2797
Decided
Nov 2, 2012The decision states Nov 2, 2012 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The Dweck Law Firm, LLP
Outcome
Settled
The parties indicate that they have fully and finally settled the matter. 2 Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jack S. Dweck
The Dweck Law Firm, LLP
New York, NY
For the respondent
Leigh Erin S. Izzo and Nicole Ludwig
Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration
New York, NY
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 913 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Nov 2, 2012 on its own faceRespondent GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 2, 2012

CBCA 2797

MID-HUDSON PROPERTIES,

Appellant,

v.

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,

Respondent.

Jack S. Dweck of The Dweck Law Firm, LLP, New York, NY, counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Leigh Erin S. Izzo and Nicole Ludwig, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, New York, NY, counsel for Respondent

McCANN, Board Judge.

Order

Appellant submitted a claim to the contracting officer in the amount of $4439.88 for unpaid lease payments under lease number GS-02B-22396. On January 3, 2012, the contracting officer issued a final decision denying that claim and appellant filed a timely appeal. On October 26, 2012, appellant and respondent filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice. The parties indicate that they have fully and finally settled the matter.

2 CBCA 2797

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

R. ANTHONY McCANN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Mid-Hudson Properties, CBCA 2797. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.