CBCA 2905

Ceridian Corporation

Sep 17, 2013Judge SomersDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Ceridian Corporation
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Judge
Somers
Case number
CBCA 2905
Decided
Sep 17, 2013The decision states Sep 17, 2013 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Jurisdiction and timeliness

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
John W. Chierichella and Townsend L. Bourne and Ryan E. Roberts
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Charles B. Wallace and Sherry K. Kaswell and Sarah Zaffina
Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 886 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 17, 2013 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 17, 2013

CBCA 2905

CERIDIAN CORPORATION,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

John W. Chierichella, Townsend L. Bourne, and Ryan E. Roberts of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for Appellant.

Charles B. Wallace, Sherry K. Kaswell, and Sarah Zaffina, Office of the Solicitor, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

SOMERS, Board Judge.

Order

On October 4, 2012, Ceridian Corporation appealed the deemed denial of its certified claim under Department of the Interior contract number N10PC18114 for the Military OneSource Program. On September 16, 2013, the parties jointly moved to dismiss this appeal with prejudice, stating that they had reached a settlement agreement. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

___________________________

JERI KAYLENE SOMERS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Ceridian Corporation, CBCA 2905. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.