CBCA 3239-R

The Ducke Groupe, LLC dba Haven House Veterans Residence

Oct 28, 2013Judge VergilioDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingDenied

Key Facts

Appellant
The Ducke Groupe, LLC dba Haven House Veterans Residence
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Vergilio
Case number
CBCA 3239-R
Decided
Oct 28, 2013The decision states Oct 28, 2013 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Denied
The Board DENIES the motion for reconsideration.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

Procedure and sanctions

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Donald A. Woodruff
The Ducke Groupe, LLC
Cleveland, OH
For the respondent
Lindsay C. Roop
Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Columbus, OH
For the respondent
Natica C. Neely
Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Minneapolis, MN
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,940 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Oct 28, 2013 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

1 authority read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Agency FAR supplements1

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DENIED: October 28, 2013

CBCA 3239-R

THE DUCKE GROUPE, LLC dba HAVEN HOUSE VETERANS RESIDENCE,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Donald A. Woodruff, Director of The Ducke Groupe, LLC, Cleveland, OH, appearing for Appellant.

Lindsay C. Roop, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Columbus, OH; and Natica C. Neely, Office of Regional Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Minneapolis, MN, counsel for Respondent.

VERGILIO, Board Judge.

On July 24, 2013, the Board received from The Ducke Groupe, LLC dba Haven House Veterans Residence (contractor) a request for reconsideration of the decision issued June 24, 2013, Ducke Groupe, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 3239, 13 BCA ¶ 35,337, denying the contractor’s claim. The contractor alleges various factual and legal errors in the opinion, raising, in part, arguments not previously raised, and referencing material not in the evidentiary record.

The contractor has not provided a valid basis for reconsideration. Rules 26, 27 (48 CFR 6101.26, .27 (2012)). References by the contractor to regulations and case law addressing matters a contracting officer should consider when formulating a solicitation that may or may not include options are not relevant in this post-award context when the contract included options. The simple fact that the agency ordered fewer services during the first option year than estimated at the time of award does not demonstrate any inaccuracy in formulating the estimates. The contractor overlooks the explicit cautions in the solicitation and contract, wherein the agency noted that services to be required could not be determined with any certainty, and that payment would be based upon services ordered and rendered. The contractor’s further attempts to reform the contract are unavailing.

Decision

The Board DENIES the motion for reconsideration.

______________________________

JOSEPH A. VERGILIO

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in The Ducke Groupe, LLC dba Haven House Veterans Residence, CBCA 3239-R. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.