CBCA 3694-C(2235)

Russell Sand & Gravel Company, Inc

Jan 31, 2014Judge DanielsINTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION
Not published in the listingWithdrawn

Key Facts

Appellant
Russell Sand & Gravel Company, Inc
Respondent agency
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 3694-C(2235)
Decided
Jan 31, 2014The decision states Jan 31, 2014 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Law Offices of Mickey Beisman
Outcome
Withdrawn
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from that line, because the decision's text states no operative ruling we could isolate. No model is involved.

Topics

EAJA and feesProcedure and sanctions

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions. They are ordered strongest first.

Appearances

For the appellant
Mickey Beisman
Law Offices of Mickey Beisman
Albuquerque, NM
For the respondent
Luisa M. Alvarez
Office of the Legal Advisor, United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission
El Paso, TX
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,053 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Jan 31, 2014 on its own faceRespondent INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

Authorities cited

2 authorities read from this decision's own text, grouped by the body of law each comes from. Select one to read it at its publisher.

Equal Access to Justice Act2

Read from the decision's own words with no model involved. Statutes, regulations, the acts these forums argue by name, and cases at the board, this office or the Comptroller General are recognized; any other citation form is left out rather than guessed at, so this is a floor on what the decision cites.

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: January 31, 2014

CBCA 3694-C(2235)

RUSSELL SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC.,

Applicant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND WATER COMMISSION,

Respondent.

Mickey Beisman of Law Offices of Mickey Beisman, Albuquerque, NM, counsel for

Applicant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Luisa M. Alvarez, Office of the Legal Advisor, United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, El Paso, TX, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

Russell Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. filed an application for fees and other expenses allegedly incurred in prosecuting a case which was decided by this Board, Russell Sand & Gravel Co. v. International Boundary & Water Commission, CBCA 2235, 13 BCA ¶ 35,455. In response to an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed as prematurely filed, the applicant has withdrawn the application.

Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to its reinstatement at a time permitted by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 (2012).

_________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Russell Sand & Gravel Company, Inc, CBCA 3694-C(2235). Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Topic

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.