CBCA 3808

N.K. BHANDARI, Architecture & Engineering, P.C.

Sep 30, 2014Judge DanielsDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Not published in the listingSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
N.K. BHANDARI, Architecture & Engineering, P.C.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 3808
Decided
Sep 30, 2014The decision states Sep 30, 2014 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Not published in the listingThe Board's year tables for 2007 through 2014 carry no Type column, so no disposition was published for this decision. It is not missing data and nothing is inferred from the document.
Law firm for the appellant
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Todd R. Overman and Brian M. Dobbs
Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
Washington, DC
For the respondent
Ricarto Brazela and Charlma Quarles
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,469 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 30, 2014 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 30, 2014

CBCA 3808

N.K. BHANDARI, ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING, P.C.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent.

Todd R. Overman and Brian M. Dobbs of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC, Washington, DC,

counsel for Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Ricarto Brazela and Charlma Quarles, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded to N.K. Bhandari, Architecture & Engineering, P.C. (Bhandari) an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for the provision of architect and engineering services. The VA chose not to exercise its option to continue the contract beyond its first year. Bhandari claimed this determination was made in bad faith because it was based on an incorrect assessment of the contractor’s performance. Bhandari also claimed entitlement to $1,110,235, consisting of $116,074 in costs incurred but not reimbursed by the VA on task orders performed under the contract and $994,161 in task orders and fee proposals accepted but later withdrawn. The contracting officer denied the claim, except for the $116,074 in costs, and Bhandari appealed his decision.

The parties have now resolved their dispute and jointly move the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice to its reinstatement.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in N.K. BHANDARI, Architecture & Engineering, P.C., CBCA 3808. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.