DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: November 6, 2014
CBCA 4031
CDM SMITH INC.,
Appellant,
v.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT,
Respondent.
Paul Milligan of CDM Smith Inc., Cambridge, MA, counsel for Appellant.
R. René Dupuy and Scott Risner, Office of the General Counsel, Agency for
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
International Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
CDM Smith Inc. claimed that it was entitled to be paid an additional $611,182.57 for work it performed under a contract with the Agency for International Development in the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. The parties began settlement negotiations shortly after this appeal of an adverse contracting officer’s decision was filed. They have now resolved their dispute, and the contractor has asked the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice to its reinstatement. The agency has no objection to the request.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
_________________________
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in CDM Smith Inc, CBCA 4031. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.