DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 18, 2007
ARCH 1650 PARTNERS, LP,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
Richard J. Conway of Dickstein Shapiro LLP, Washington, DC, counsel for
Appellant.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Torrie N. Harris, Office of General Counsel, General Services Administration, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
Arch 1650 Partners, LP (Arch) filed appeals challenging two decisions issued by a General Services Administration (GSA) contracting officer regarding adjustments to rental payments under contracts for the lease by Arch to GSA of property in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The parties have informed the Board that they have settled their disputes and that consequent to the settlement, GSA has paid a sum of money to Arch. The parties have asked the Board to dismiss the appeals with prejudice.
_________________________
2 CBCA 421, 422
Accordingly, the appeals are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Arch 1650 Partners, Lp, CBCA 421, 422. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.