CBCA 4337

Unissant, Inc.

Feb 4, 2015Judge GoodmanDEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Unissant, Inc.
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Judge
Goodman
Case number
CBCA 4337
Decided
Feb 4, 2015The decision states Feb 4, 2015 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
Randolph Law, PLLC
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Christopher R. Shiplett
Randolph Law, PLLC
Arlington, VA
For the respondent
Kasey M. Podzius and Julie K. Cannatti
Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development
Washington, DC
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision1 pages, 654 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Feb 4, 2015 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: February 4, 2015

CBCA 4337

UNISSANT, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,

Respondent.

Christopher R. Shiplett of Randolph Law, PLLC, Arlington, VA, counsel for

Appellant.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Kasey M. Podzius and Julie K. Cannatti, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC, counsel for Respondent.

GOODMAN, Board Judge.

Order

On February 3, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this matter, advising the Board that the parties had successfully settled the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

__________________________

ALLAN H. GOODMAN

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Unissant, Inc., CBCA 4337. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.