DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: April 13, 2007
CBCA 441
2
COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE INC.,
Appellant,
v.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.
Pat D. Dixon, Jr., General Counsel of Computer Intelligence2 Inc., Marietta, GA, counsel for Appellant.
George U. Lane, Office of Regional Counsel, General Services Administration, Atlanta, GA, counsel for Respondent.
DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).
Order
2
Computer Intelligence Inc. claimed that it was entitled to $2,152,630.03 more than it had been paid under a task order issued by the General Services Administration (GSA) for the provision of telecommunications support services. A GSA contracting officer denied the claim. The contractor appealed this decision and later increased the amount of its claim to $3,289,026.40.
The parties engaged in extensive settlement negotiations, as a result of which they have agreed to resolve their dispute. Under their settlement agreement, GSA will pay to the appellant the sum of $2,600,000.
_________________________
2 CBCA 441
The parties have asked that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice. The Board grants the request. The appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
STEPHEN M. DANIELS
Board Judge
This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Computer Intelligence 2 Inc., CBCA 441. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.