CBCA 5111

Union Reforesters

Sep 15, 2016Judge DanielsDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
DismissalSettled

Key Facts

Appellant
Union Reforesters
Respondent agency
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Judge
Daniels
Case number
CBCA 5111
Decided
Sep 15, 2016The decision states Sep 15, 2016 on its own face, which agrees with the listing.
Decision type
Dismissal
Law firm for the appellant
The decision's own appearances block names no outside firm, which happens when the appellant appeared pro se, through one of its own officers, or through its in-house counsel.
Outcome
Settled
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Read from the shouted disposition line the Board prints above this decision's own date, and quoted from its operative sentence above. No model is involved.

Topics

The topic rules ran over this decision's own words and none of them matched.

Topics are derived from each decision's own text by keyword rules, not a classification by the Board. A decision matching several topics carries all of them, so topic counts sum above the number of decisions.

Appearances

For the appellant
Jorge E. Acevedo
Union Reforesters
Redding, CA
For the respondent
Marnie G. Ganotis
Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture
San Francisco, CA
Decision PDF (cbca.gov) Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act casesThe Board's year listing this row was read fromThe decision document is hosted by the Board itself, so it is an official copy, and the Board's own Contract Disputes Act case listing is the citable source. The topics, the disposition and the appearances above are read deterministically from the decision's own words; no model is involved.

Research This Decision

Create a free account to open this decision in the CBCA workspace: a grounded decision brief drafted from the Board's own words, the Insights dashboard over the whole corpus, and the filtered browser.

CBCA Decision Brief

A Workflows Hub brief on this decision, drafted from the captured text with every quote and authority checked against it.

Insights

Who prevails before the Board, by topic and by judge, with every denominator visible: merits rulings, not decisions.

Browse with Filters

The whole corpus by year, decision type, topic, judge and disposition, searchable across the decisions' own text.

Full Decision

Full text of the decision2 pages, 1,342 characters, read from the Board's own documentDecided Sep 15, 2016 on its own faceRespondent DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Decision documentOfficial source: Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Contract Disputes Act cases

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: September 15, 2016

CBCA 5111

UNION REFORESTERS,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,

Respondent.

The case caption as the decision prints it. Every word is kept; the rule the Board draws around it is not text, so it is not repeated here.

Jorge E. Acevedo, Owner of Union Reforesters, Redding, CA, appearing for Appellant.

Marnie G. Ganotis, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Agriculture, San Francisco, CA, counsel for Respondent.

DANIELS, Board Judge (Chairman).

Order

Under a contract with the United States Forest Service, an entity within the Department of Agriculture, Union Reforesters applied herbicide to vegetation growing near young trees in the Eldorado National Forest in California. Union Reforesters claimed that in addition to the contract price, it was entitled to payment in the amount of $218,618.65 to cover “Cost Overruns, Indirect Labor, Change in Work Sites and Work Stoppages due to excessive winds, additional Labor Costs due to protecting trees while spraying, extra costs in the use of herbicides and added and necessary equipment to perform the work on this Contract.” The contracting officer denied the claim, and the contractor appealed his decision. As a result of mediation with Board Judge Kathleen J. O’Rourke, the parties have resolved their dispute and asked the Board to dismiss the appeal with prejudice.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

_________________________

STEPHEN M. DANIELS

Board Judge

This is a verbatim capture of the text layer of the Board's own document in Union Reforesters, CBCA 5111. Nothing is summarized or reworded, and the sections run in the order the Board wrote them. What the page shows and the text does not repeat is the pagination furniture: the page numbers and the rules the Board draws around its caption and under its signatures. The signatures are set back into the columns the Board prints them in, each judge under the name he or she signed, and the typed copy of that name the page carries beneath each signature is not repeated.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.