56885

Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc.

November 24, 2010Judge Delman
Partially SustainedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc. appealed a decision regarding deductions taken by the government for unsatisfactory work under a contract. The Board dismissed part of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to the claim being time-barred.

Material Facts

  • The contract was awarded to Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc. for grounds maintenance at the Lemoore Naval Air Station.
  • The contract included a base year and four one-year option periods.
  • The government took deductions from the appellant's invoices for unsatisfactory work during various periods.
  • The appellant expressed concerns over the deductions and alleged wrongful inspection methods in a letter dated 6 August 2002.
  • The appellant submitted a request for equitable adjustment in January 2007, which was denied by the contracting officer.
  • The appellant converted its request for equitable adjustment into a claim under the Contract Disputes Act in September 2008.
  • The contracting officer granted part of the claim in May 2009 but denied the balance.

Parties

Appellant
Cardinal Maintenance Service, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Navy
Contract Number
N62474-97-D-2478
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.