Contrack International, Inc.
Contrack International, Inc. appealed the deemed denial of its claims for payment of negotiated settlement amounts for equitable adjustments under two contracts. The Board denied the government's motions to dismiss, allowing the appeals to proceed.
Material Facts
- The government issued Task Order 0008 under Contract No. W912ER-04-D-0003 to CII for construction of an ammunition supply point at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan.
- The government awarded Contract No. W917PM-04-C-0007 to CII for design, construction and rehabilitation of the runway at Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan.
- CII and the government reached claim settlement agreements for price increases of $1,750,000 for Task Order 0008 and $7,300,000 for Contract 0007, subject to the availability of funds.
- Partial payments were made by the government on the settlement agreements, with interest starting on the balances due on both agreements from 1 November 2007.
- CII submitted certified claims to the contracting officer under the Contract Disputes Act for the unpaid balances due on the settlement agreements plus accrued interest.
- CII appealed the deemed denial of the claims to the Board on 31 October 2008.
- The government moved to dismiss the appeals, asserting that CII had waived its rights to further interest.
Parties
- Appellant
- Contrack International, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East
- Contract Number
- W912ER-04-D-0003
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 59273April 8, 2015
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343March 2, 2015
- SureTec Insurance CompanyNo. 59343, 59647January 2, 2015
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343November 7, 2014
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343October 23, 2014
- Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.No. 58343October 22, 2014
Same Year
- C.E.M.E.S. S.p.A.No. 56253, 57355December 29, 2010
- Shaw Environmental, Inc.No. 57237December 16, 2010
- Thorington Electrical and Construction CompanyNo. 56997December 13, 2010
- Phoenix Management, Inc.No. 57234December 13, 2010
- Parsons Global Services, Inc.No. 56731December 3, 2010
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168November 29, 2010
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026