54774

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Space Systems Division

July 23, 2010Judge Page
Denied / Government PrevailedContract Formation / ExistenceContract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive ChangesEquitable Adjustment (REA)Quantum / DamagesPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingCDA JurisdictionAuthority of Government AgentsDCAA Involved

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Space Systems Division appealed a contracting officer’s denial of claims arising from alleged settlement terms, Alliant-related closeout activities, and REA preparation costs. The Board dismissed certain jurisdictional theories, rejected the alleged agreement and constructive-change theories, denied recovery of REA preparation costs, and denied the appeal in its entirety.

Material Facts

  • The Army and Aerojet entered into the LRP-2 contract in February 1997 for production of SADARM projectiles under a firm-fixed-price arrangement.
  • The contract incorporated FAR 52.233-1 and FAR 52.243-1 and included an option for additional projectiles.
  • The government’s Picatinny SADARM program office lacked authority to control the amount or purposes of higher-level funding, and several program officials lacked contracting officer authority.
  • Reliability testing produced poor results, and the government withheld or restricted FY 1999 funding pending resolution of test problems.
  • Modification No. P00017 authorized an undefinitized contract action for additional projectiles, established a $29,300,000 ceiling, and limited expenditures before definitization.
  • At the 17 September 1999 meeting, contractor representatives proposed a package involving FY 1998 and FY 1999 funds and wrote the terms on a white board.
  • The government’s contracting officer stated that the government could not guarantee or obligate FY 1999 funds and later issued unilateral Modification No. P00032 for the FY 1998 portion.
  • Only contractor representatives signed the white board; the contracting officer did not sign it, and the Board found that the government rejected the proposed inseparable funding terms.
  • Aerojet and Alliant entered into a Comprehensive Settlement Agreement without government knowledge or direction, and Aerojet acquired and moved Alliant’s production line.
  • Aerojet submitted a proposal seeking $651,515 for the Alliant transition and separately sought REA preparation costs.
  • DCAA audited Aerojet’s proposal to definitize Modification No. P00017 and questioned certain proposed costs.
  • The REA was prepared after contract performance was completed and was materially similar to the later claim.

Parties

Appellant
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Space Systems Division
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contracting Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
DAAE30-97-C-1005
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.