57741

Inframat Corporation

August 3, 2012Judge James
Denied / Government PrevailedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverFailure to Prosecute / DismissalDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Inframat Corporation appealed the contracting officer's decision denying its request to waive penalties for unallowable costs in its final indirect cost proposal. The Board granted the government's motion for summary judgment, denying the appeal.

Material Facts

  • Inframat Corporation was awarded two contracts by the U.S. Air Force for technical supplies and services.
  • The contracts incorporated the FAR 52.242-3 clause regarding penalties for unallowable costs.
  • Inframat submitted a final incurred cost rate proposal for fiscal year 2004 that included expressly unallowable costs.
  • The Defense Contract Audit Agency questioned several costs as unallowable and recommended penalties.
  • The contracting officer determined that Inframat's proposal included unallowable costs and imposed penalties totaling $29,016.
  • Inframat appealed the contracting officer's decision within 90 days, asserting that it had taken corrective actions.

Parties

Appellant
Inframat Corporation
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
F29601-02-C-0031
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.