578845866658958589595898259038591645916559391593925939359418594195942059481596155961859619596365965359675596765968159682596835981159830598635986759872598796001760024602506030960365

Supreme Foodservice, GmbH

March 17, 2016Judge Scott
Partially SustainedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverStatute of Limitations / TimelinessEAJA / Attorney FeesDCAA Involved

Supreme Foodservice GmbH appealed the contracting officer's denial of claims under the Contract Disputes Act, while the government asserted affirmative defenses including fraud in the inducement and conflict of interest.

Material Facts

  • The contract was a Subsistence Prime Vendor contract for delivery of food and other products to U.S. military customers in Afghanistan.
  • The contracting officer denied Supreme's claims for payment and asserted claims against Supreme, alleging fraud and conflict of interest.
  • Supreme's principal owner, MAJ Alvarez, had prior involvement with DLA and was later employed by Supreme.
  • The contract was awarded to Supreme on 3 June 2005, with modifications made throughout its performance.
  • The government alleged that Supreme made material misrepresentations regarding pricing and relationships with suppliers.

Parties

Appellant
Supreme Foodservice GmbH
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contract Number
SPM300-05-D-3130
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.