Supreme Foodservice GmbH
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals addressed appeals by Supreme Foodservice GmbH regarding claims totaling approximately $8.3 billion by the Defense Logistics Agency, which contended the contract was void due to fraud. The Board ultimately reaffirmed its previous decision denying the government's motion for summary judgment.
Material Facts
- The contract involved the delivery of food, water, and other products to the U.S. military and DLA customers in Afghanistan.
- DLA's major claim was that the contract was void ab initio due to fraud by Supreme at contract inception.
- Supreme had a guilty plea in a criminal proceeding related to fraud issues concerning pricing under the contract.
- DLA moved for summary judgment on its first material breach defense based on Supreme's guilty plea.
- The Board found material facts in dispute and denied both DLA's motion for summary judgment and Supreme's motion to strike DLA's first material breach defense.
Parties
- Appellant
- Supreme Foodservice GmbH
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Logistics Agency
- Contract Number
- SPM300-05-D-3130
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Pratt & Whitney, a division of Raytheon Technologies CompanyNo. 59222November 22, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58212, 58753June 14, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58841June 14, 2021
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58842June 14, 2021
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59439, 59440, 59441June 14, 2021
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 60699June 14, 2021
Same Year
- Columbia State Bank f/k/a Castle-Rose, Inc.No. 59531December 28, 2017
- Fluor Federal Solutions, LLCNo. 61431-983December 28, 2017
- Goodwill Services, Inc.No. 61439December 27, 2017
- Suffolk Construction Company, Inc.No. 60990December 27, 2017
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 60218December 21, 2017
- Parsons Government Services, Inc.No. 60221December 21, 2017
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026