578845866658958589595898259038591645916559391593925939359418594195942059481596155961859619596365965359675596765968159682596835981159830598635986759872598796001760024602506030960365

Supreme Foodservice GmbH

April 27, 2017Judge Scott
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals addressed appeals by Supreme Foodservice GmbH regarding claims totaling approximately $8.3 billion by the Defense Logistics Agency, which contended the contract was void due to fraud. The Board ultimately reaffirmed its previous decision denying the government's motion for summary judgment.

Material Facts

  • The contract involved the delivery of food, water, and other products to the U.S. military and DLA customers in Afghanistan.
  • DLA's major claim was that the contract was void ab initio due to fraud by Supreme at contract inception.
  • Supreme had a guilty plea in a criminal proceeding related to fraud issues concerning pricing under the contract.
  • DLA moved for summary judgment on its first material breach defense based on Supreme's guilty plea.
  • The Board found material facts in dispute and denied both DLA's motion for summary judgment and Supreme's motion to strike DLA's first material breach defense.

Parties

Appellant
Supreme Foodservice GmbH
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Contract Number
SPM300-05-D-3130
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.