64120

Africa Transport Logistics Company

October 1, 2026Judge McLish
Partially SustainedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Contract InterpretationContract Changes / Constructive ChangesInspection / Acceptance / Warranty / Latent DefectsQuantum / DamagesPayment / Progress Payments / Financing

Africa Transport Logistics Company appealed the denial of its claim for property damage and lost rent arising from the government's occupancy of a leased house in Burkina Faso. The Board granted the appeal in part as to entitlement, denied it in part, and remanded quantum because the record was insufficient to determine recoverable amounts.

Material Facts

  • The government leased ATLC's three-story house in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, for military housing.
  • The lease assigned ATLC responsibility for maintaining the premises, appliances, systems, windows, exterior grounds, swimming pool, and septic system.
  • The lease expressly permitted the government to install steel doors but contained no other specific authorization for major security modifications.
  • The lease required changes to be made in a written amendment signed by both parties and disavowed oral modifications.
  • The government installed steel doors, window reinforcements, barricades, security-related electrical and plumbing modifications, partition walls, and surveillance or communications equipment.
  • The government vacated the property in May 2024, while the steel reinforcements remained in place.
  • ATLC paid a contractor to remove the steel reinforcements on October 17, 2024.
  • The presence of the steel reinforcements made the property unsuitable for rental until they were removed.
  • The claim sought compensation for alleged property damage and rent allegedly lost after the government's departure.
  • The contracting officer denied the claim in its entirety.

Parties

Appellant
Africa Transport Logistics Company
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
DACA-31-5-23-0208
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.