Symetrics Industries, LLC
Symetrics Industries, LLC sought additional compensation for components ordered by the Air Force in excess of contract-period maximum quantities and paid at the lower prices applicable to those periods. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Board denied the government's motion and granted Symetrics's cross-motion for partial summary judgment on liability, holding that subsequent exercise of the options and acceptance and payment of the excess quantities ratified the earlier unauthorized orders and required payment at the applicable option prices.
Material Facts
- The Air Force awarded Symetrics an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract to produce components of the Countermeasure Dispenser System.
- The contract contained a base period and four option periods, and individual component CLINs had maximum quantities and quantity-range unit prices.
- The contract stated that the Government may order the maximum quantity under each line item.
- The parties agreed that the Air Force ordered quantities exceeding the applicable contract-period maximums on twelve occasions involving five components.
- Symetrics supplied all quantities ordered by the Air Force in excess of the contract-period maximums.
- The Air Force later exercised all options for all individual components and CLINs.
- The Air Force paid Symetrics for the excess quantities at the prices applicable during the periods in which the stated maximum quantities were reached.
- The contracting officer knew the number of components ordered by the Air Force.
Parties
- Appellant
- Symetrics Industries, LLC
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Air Force
- Contracting Agency
- Department of the Air Force
- Contract Number
- FA8540-06-D-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Sauer IncorporatedNo. 62302, 62303December 18, 2024
- Platinum Services, Inc.No. 62199, 62200August 1, 2024
- Modus Operandi, Inc.No. 62639August 30, 2023
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 63360-ADRApril 6, 2023
- Advanced Technologies Group, Inc.No. 59986, 61092November 18, 2020
- Al Arrab Contracting Co., Ltd.No. 58493, 58877November 4, 2020
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026