58081

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

December 2, 2016Judge D'Alessandris
Partially SustainedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Quantum / DamagesContract Changes / Constructive ChangesContract InterpretationPayment / Progress Payments / FinancingInspection / Acceptance / Warranty / Latent DefectsStatutory ComplianceDCAA InvolvedCommercial Item

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. appealed a contracting officer’s disallowance of subcontractor costs incurred under the CONCAP III contract. The Board sustained the appeal in part, held most challenged costs allowable or reasonable, upheld the disallowance of Kustom’s increased mobilization and demobilization charges, and remanded the appropriate withholding for FSS payroll deficiencies to the parties for quantum negotiation.

Material Facts

  • CONCAP III was a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee, Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite-Quantity contract requiring emergency construction and support capabilities.
  • KBR generally used fixed all-in labor rates because the undefined contingency work made firm-fixed-price subcontracts impracticable.
  • KBR had an approved purchasing system and was not required to obtain contracting officer approval before executing most types of subcontracts.
  • BMS-CAT performed under time-and-materials arrangements and invoiced a 21% markup on labor and equipment costs.
  • KBR’s program manager testified that KBR and BMS-CAT orally agreed to permit the labor markup, and BMS-CAT continued submitting invoices with the markup that KBR continued paying.
  • ECC performed under a fixed-price, time-and-materials subcontract at a fixed hourly rate, and its bid was competitive with or lower than comparable offers after adjustment for disclosed overhead items.
  • BE&K’s workforce was shifted from anticipated public-works services to tent-camp construction subject to Davis-Bacon Act wages, requiring labor-rate adjustments.
  • KBR presented supporting documentation for the disputed BE&K costs, including the Lowe’s receipt and Riverside Electricians invoices.
  • FSS performed the work but submitted payroll information in an incorrect format rather than providing certified payrolls in the required form.
  • Kustom increased its mobilization and demobilization charges by $69,000 and increased its hourly labor rate by $13 per hour.
  • Bear requested an adjustment after supplier freight and fuel costs increased, and the Navy did not dispute the adjustment for limestone placed after the request.
  • CMARK’s dining-facility subcontract was negotiated during the urgent post-Hurricane Katrina response and included a minimum charge based on 2,500 meals per meal service.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic
Contracting Agency
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic
Contract Number
N62470-04-D-4017
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.