59435594365943759438600566005760058600596006060061

Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile Systems

May 14, 2026Judge D'Alessandris
Partially SustainedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Indirect Rates / Incurred CostCost Accounting Standards (CAS)Statutory ComplianceDCAA InvolvedDCMA InvolvedCAS at Issue

The Board on remand addressed whether Raytheon was subject to penalties for expressly unallowable lobbying and merger and acquisition costs and whether the government could pursue penalties under CAS 405. The Board denied Raytheon's appeal concerning Level 1 penalties but sustained its appeal concerning CAS 405 penalties because the government had not appealed the Board's prior denial of that claim.

Material Facts

  • Raytheon included lobbying and merger and acquisition costs in its final indirect-cost proposals for fiscal years 2007 and 2008.
  • Raytheon withdrew only lobbying costs incurred during normal business hours, leaving lobbying performed after-hours included in the proposals.
  • Raytheon withdrew merger and acquisition costs incurred after an indicative offer or decision to go to market, leaving planning costs incurred before those events included in the proposals.
  • The evidence was insufficient to establish that Raytheon's CAS disclosure statements adequately disclosed these practices to the government or that the government consented to them.
  • The contracting officer denied Raytheon's request for a penalty waiver.
  • The contracting officer relied on recurring instances of expressly unallowable costs and determined that Raytheon's policies, training, and internal controls were insufficient to preclude such costs from final indirect cost rate proposals.
  • Raytheon testified that it intentionally included the expressly unallowable costs in its proposals.
  • The government appealed the Board's 2021 decision but did not seek reversal of the Board's denial of CAS 405 penalties.

Parties

Appellant
Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile Systems
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
W15P7T-07-C-P207; W31P4Q-07-C-0159
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.