Raytheon Company
Raytheon Company sought partial summary judgment concerning the allowability of certain 2005 airfare expenses under the pre-2010 version of FAR 31.205-46. The Board denied summary judgment on the interpretation, discount, and travel-policy issues, but granted Raytheon summary judgment on the allocability issue because the government did not oppose it.
Material Facts
- Congress expressed a procurement policy that costs for travel by commercial aircraft exceeding the amount of the standard commercial fare are not allowable.
- FAR 31.205-46(b) provided, before its 2010 amendment, that airfare costs exceeding the lowest customary standard, coach, or equivalent airfare offered were unallowable unless specified conditions were documented and justified.
- The contract was awarded to Raytheon on 21 May 2003 and incorporated FAR 52.216-7 and the allowability provisions of FAR Part 31.2 in effect on the contract date.
- Raytheon incurred airfare costs in 2005, including coach fares, premium airfares, and costs associated with certain multi-leg flights.
- DCAA issued an audit report on 24 August 2009 addressing Raytheon's incurred airfare costs for 2005.
- The contracting officer divided the costs determined to be unallowable into four categories, including unused negotiated corporate discounts and unjustified premium airfares.
- Raytheon requested summary judgment on four issues concerning the airfare baseline, application of discounts, DCMA's alleged reliance on a misstatement of travel policy, and allocability to Department of Defense contracts.
- The government did not oppose Raytheon's motion with respect to Issue 4.
Parties
- Appellant
- Raytheon Company
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contract Number
- F08635-03-C-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kelly-Ryan, Inc.No. 57168December 5, 2017
- Optimum Services, Inc.No. 58755, 59952July 20, 2017
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 61191, 61192, 61193June 6, 2017
- Raytheon CompanyNo. 58849May 2, 2017
- Swinerton Builders NorthwestNo. 57329April 24, 2017
- General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.No. 60002, 60003March 24, 2017
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026