58343

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.

July 25, 2014Judge Freeman
Partially SustainedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverCDA JurisdictionStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc. appealed the deemed denial of its termination settlement claim under Contract No. N62470-95-B-2399, which the Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over a substantial portion of the claim.

Material Facts

  • The appeal arises from the Board's decision of 28 September 2011 converting the government's termination for default of Contract 2399 to a termination for convenience.
  • Contract 2399 was a firm-fixed-price construction contract awarded on 13 November 1995 with a price of $561,764.25.
  • ESCI submitted a proposal for an increase of $205,463.60 on 7 April 1997 due to additional work and delays allegedly caused by the government.
  • Modification No. P00006 was signed on 23 June 1997, which included a general release and an agreed price adjustment increasing the contract price to $561,873.25.
  • The contract was terminated for default on 12 June 1998 due to failure to make progress.
  • ESCI submitted a termination settlement proposal on 5 July 2012 for $1,183,366.59, which was deemed denied when the contracting officer did not respond.
  • ESCI appealed the deemed denial on 29 September 2012, leading to ASBCA No. 58343.

Parties

Appellant
Environmental Safety Consultants, Inc.
Contract Number
N62470-95-B-2399
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.