58465

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

February 3, 2016Judge Shackleford
Denied / Government PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Statute of Limitations / TimelinessDCAA InvolvedDCMA Involved

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. moved for summary judgment on the ground that the government's claim for allegedly unallowable trash-truck costs was barred by the Contract Disputes Act's six-year statute of limitations. The Board denied the motion because genuine issues remained concerning when the government knew or should have known of the events fixing liability.

Material Facts

  • The Department of the Army awarded KBR an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract supporting the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program.
  • Individual task orders under the contract were issued on either a firm-fixed-priced or cost-reimbursable basis.
  • The contracting officer issued cost-plus-award-fee Task Order No. 0059 for logistics and life-support services supporting V Corps and Coalition forces during Operation Iraqi Freedom.
  • Task Order No. 0059 included waste-management and trash-removal services at eight sites in Iraq.
  • KBR obtained contracting officer consent to purchase 20 trash trucks for performance of the task order.
  • KBR purchased trucks from Najd Company and accepted delivery of 20 trucks in Jordan.
  • KBR's inspection unit recommended rejecting five trucks because of alleged quality, design, safety, and minimum-industry-standard deficiencies.
  • KBR pursued litigation and arbitration against Najd concerning the trucks and later settled the dispute by accepting the delivered trucks and paying the remaining amount withheld.
  • After the settlement, KBR distributed the remaining trucks to sites in Iraq where they were used for trash-removal services.
  • DCAA questioned the total cost associated with the 20 trucks under FAR 31.201-3 and identified alleged failures in procurement evaluation, quality inspection, and vehicle maintenance.
  • The ACO issued a final decision asserting a monetary claim for overpayments corresponding to 15 trucks deemed unallowable.
  • KBR argued that the government's claim accrued no later than 17 March 2005 or 15 June 2006.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contracting Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.