58633

Engineering Solutions & Products, LLC

August 4, 2017Judge D'Alessandris
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationQuantum / Damages

Engineering Solutions & Products, LLC appealed a denial of its claim for costs associated with an early termination fee and other expenses related to a warehouse lease with the Army. The Board denied the appeal, finding no implied-in-fact contract existed.

Material Facts

  • ESP leased a warehouse from First Potomac Realty Trust to support the Army Program Executive Office Soldier.
  • ESP held a prime contract to provide warehouse space for government use issued by the Department of the Treasury.
  • The Army indicated interest in leasing more warehouse space, prompting ESP to negotiate an expansion of the warehouse.
  • ESP entered into a ten-year lease with FPRT with front-loaded rent and an early termination fee.
  • The Army vacated the warehouse in March 2012, approximately five years into ESP's ten-year lease.
  • ESP contended there was an implied-in-fact contract requiring the Army to pay the early termination fee and other costs totaling roughly $4.2 million.
  • ESP's claim was denied by the Army's contracting officer, leading to the appeal.

Parties

Appellant
Engineering Solutions & Products, LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contracting Agency
Department of the Treasury
Contract Number
000000-00-0-0000
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.