All Star Technical Services, Inc.
All Star Technical Services, Inc. appealed claims against the Army regarding a bridge contract for base maintenance support services at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The Board sustained some claims related to the issuance of service orders and equitable adjustments.
Material Facts
- All Star provided base maintenance support services at Fort Huachuca under Contract No. W912A-06-C-0004.
- The government entered into sole source negotiations with All Star to provide bridge services until a new contract could be competed.
- Contract No. W9124A-11-C-0002 was issued to All Star for facility maintenance with an initial base period of seven months and five one-month option periods.
- The bridge contract required the contractor to perform work in five categories, including service orders and individual job orders.
- The government improperly issued service orders instead of individual job orders for certain work, which exceeded the limitations set for service orders.
Parties
- Appellant
- All Star Technical Services, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W9124A-11-C-0002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Sierra Nevada CorporationNo. 63649February 24, 2026
- Sierra Nevada CorporationNo. 63933, 63934February 24, 2026
- Synergetic Technologies Group, Inc.No. 64361January 29, 2026
- Repeat Consultants International, LLCNo. 64188, 64189December 8, 2025
- Novielli Boat Builders Inc.No. 64281December 5, 2025
- United Capital Investments GroupNo. 64163December 2, 2025
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026