Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company
Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company appealed a government motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction regarding a termination settlement proposal. The Board denied the motion, retaining jurisdiction over the appeal.
Material Facts
- Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company entered into Contract No. DAAE30-03-C-1167 with the U.S. Army on 26 September 2003.
- The contract was a cost-plus-fixed-fee type contract for various training kits.
- The contract was terminated for convenience on 16 December 2009.
- EBA&D submitted its TSP on 15 December 2010, seeking a total of $1,653,557.
- The contracting officer responded on 6 January 2011 regarding the CDA certification.
- EBA&D filed its notice of appeal on 23 May 2013 after the TCO indicated negotiations would not close the gap between the parties' positions.
Parties
- Appellant
- Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Company
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army
- Contracting Agency
- Army Tank-Automotive and Armaments Command; Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center
- Contract Number
- DAAE30-03-C-1167
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Sierra Nevada CorporationNo. 63649February 24, 2026
- Sierra Nevada CorporationNo. 63933, 63934February 24, 2026
- Synergetic Technologies Group, Inc.No. 64361January 29, 2026
- Repeat Consultants International, LLCNo. 64188, 64189December 8, 2025
- Novielli Boat Builders Inc.No. 64281December 5, 2025
- United Capital Investments GroupNo. 64163December 2, 2025
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026