GSC Construction, Inc.
GSC Construction, Inc. appealed a final performance evaluation by the Navy regarding a contract for constructing a medical clinic, challenging the evaluation's accuracy and procedural adherence. The Board denied GSC's motion for summary judgment.
Material Facts
- The Naval Facilities Engineering Command awarded Contract No. N69450-07-C-1770 to GSC Construction, Inc. on 28 December 2006.
- The contract was for the construction of a consolidated medical clinic at the Naval Weapons Station in Goose Creek, South Carolina, with an original completion date of 27 January 2009.
- Modification No. P00047 extended the completion date until 21 July 2010.
- A final performance evaluation dated 23 February 2011 rated GSC's overall performance as marginal.
- GSC's Vice President expressed disagreement with the final evaluation in a letter to the contracting officer on 18 March 2011.
- The contracting officer issued a second final performance evaluation on 20 May 2011, maintaining the marginal rating.
- GSC submitted an 18 September 2012 claim to the contracting officer challenging the final performance evaluation.
- GSC's claim alleged that the evaluation was not performed in accordance with the FAR and pertinent NAVFAC Instructions.
Parties
- Appellant
- GSC Construction, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Navy
- Contracting Agency
- Naval Facilities Engineering Command
- Contract Number
- N69450-07-C-1770
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.No. 58791, 59717January 2, 2019
- John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.No. 58791, 59167, 59168, 59169, 59170, 59171, 59717October 25, 2018
- CANVS CorporationNo. 57784, 57987September 6, 2018
- K&K Industries, Inc.No. 61189September 5, 2018
- Northrop Grumman CorporationNo. 60190January 9, 2018
- Nelson, Inc.No. 57201, 58166November 8, 2017
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Michael M. Tsontos, S.A.No. 63595-EAJAJuly 11, 2025
- Fluor Federal Solutions, Inc.No. 61543February 13, 2025
- St. Michael's Inc.No. 62226, 62271, 62272January 29, 2025
- Michael M. Tsontos, S.A. Chania Sucursala BucurestiNo. 63595October 30, 2024
- Crowley Government Services, Inc.No. 63531June 7, 2023
- ServeFed, Inc.No. 63290February 2, 2023