New Iraq Ahd Company
New Iraq Ahd Company appealed a contracting officer's decision denying payment of $75,600 for lamps delivered under a government contract. The Board denied the appeal, finding no coercion in the modification of the contract price.
Material Facts
- The contract was awarded to New Iraq Ahd Company for the purchase and delivery of furniture and other items for a total price of $369,200.
- The contract included a line item for 700 lamps at a unit price of $12.00, totaling $84,000.
- A contracting officer's email indicated a mistake in the pricing of the lamps, leading to a modification that changed the unit price to $120.00.
- The contractor accepted an invoice for the lamps at the incorrect price of $12.00 per unit.
- The contracting officer later determined that the lamps delivered were of low quality and sought to renegotiate the price.
- A bilateral modification was executed to reduce the unit price back to $12.00, resulting in a total price of $8,400.
- The contractor submitted an invoice for the difference between the modified price and the original price, which was denied by the contracting officer.
Parties
- Appellant
- New Iraq Ahd Company
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91GY0-09-M-0051
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- PAW & Associates, LLCNo. 58534August 20, 2015
- DayDanyon CorporationNo. 57681August 17, 2015
- DynPort Vaccine Company LLCNo. 59298August 12, 2015
- Tri-County Contractors, Inc.No. 58167June 16, 2015
- Linc Government Services, LLCNo. 58565June 16, 2015
- SUFI Network Services, Inc.No. 55306May 20, 2015
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026