Taj Al Rajaa Company

Material Facts

• Taj Al Rajaa Company filed an appeal on 28 July 2013 regarding Contract No. W91GFC-06-M-0169.
• The government moved to dismiss the appeal on 17 October 2013 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
• The appellant's emails to the contracting officer did not constitute a CDA claim as they did not seek a sum certain.
• The alleged contract specified a performance period from 8 May 2006 to 8 May 2007.
• The appellant's claim for payment accrued prior to the contract's expiration on 8 May 2007.

Parties

Appellant

Taj Al Rajaa Company

Respondent Agency

Department of the Army

Contracting Agency

Army Contracting Command-Rock Island

Contract Number

W91GFC-06-M-0169