Hensel Phelps Construction Company
The Board denied the government's partial motion to dismiss Hensel Phelps Construction Company's delay claim for failure to state a sum certain. The Board held that the claim adequately stated a sum certain because the alleged delays and subcontractor claims appeared to share intertwined operative facts that could not be resolved separately at the pleading stage.
Material Facts
- USACE awarded Hensel Phelps a contract to construct the Bureau of Engraving and Printing Western Currency Facility Expansion Project in Fort Worth, Texas.
- The Contract divided the Project into ten Contract Line Item Numbers with separate completion dates and pricing.
- The claim attributed project delays to a seriously deficient and inadequate government-provided design and identified more than 2,200 requests for information and 198 requests for proposals.
- The claim alleged that deficient electrical and mechanical designs and incremental modifications affected multiple CLINs and prevented independent completion of the CLINs.
- The contracting officer acknowledged 190 days of government-caused delay but deemed the days non-compensable because of concurrent delays and issued a time-only modification.
- The claim used a critical-path window analysis addressing the entire project and asserted that the analysis accounted for potential concurrent delays.
- The claim included pass-through claims by six subcontractors, three of which sought delay damages.
- The contracting officer denied the claim in its entirety except for 25 days of compensable time and one differing-site condition claim.
Parties
- Appellant
- Hensel Phelps Construction Company
- Respondent Agency
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Contracting Agency
- United States Army Corps of Engineers
- Contract Number
- W9126G-18-C-0061
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Environet, Inc.No. 64167September 23, 2026
- Marine Hydraulics International, LLCNo. 63429, 63511August 6, 2026
- Vision Distributors LLCNo. 64357July 17, 2026
- KUNJ Construction CorporationNo. 63240June 12, 2026
- DRS Laurel TechnologiesNo. 63303June 3, 2026
- United Capital Investments GroupNo. 63990, 64114April 30, 2026
Same Year
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- WEB LLC/WEBCONo. 63676September 23, 2026
- Environet, Inc.No. 64167September 23, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64235, 64236September 23, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
Same Issue
- Vigor Marine, LLCNo. 63405September 24, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction Co.No. 63316, 63397, 63398August 28, 2026
- Warrior Construction Services, Inc.No. 64497August 7, 2026
- Marine Hydraulics International, LLCNo. 63429, 63511August 6, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026