POZ Engineering and Environmental Consulting
POZ Engineering and Environmental Consulting appealed for termination settlement costs after the government moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Board granted the dismissal for one appeal but retained jurisdiction over another.
Material Facts
- The contract was awarded to POZ on 11 January 2011 for quality assurance, inspection, and engineering services.
- The contract price at award was $417,158.72.
- The CO terminated the contract for the convenience of the government on 17 July 2012.
- POZ submitted a termination settlement proposal to the CO on 29 November 2012 in the amount of $22,852.07.
- The CO offered POZ $15,357.00 to settle the proposal on 2 July 2013.
- POZ rejected the government's offer on 9 July 2013 and requested reconsideration.
- POZ submitted a revised proposal of $30,916.53 on 11 July 2013.
- POZ filed a notice of appeal with the Board on 28 August 2013 seeking $46,592.57 in termination for convenience costs.
- The CO issued a determination on 11 September 2013, offering $17,468.00.
- POZ filed a notice of appeal from the CO's determination on 6 November 2013, noting its alleged settlement costs were $51,203.74.
Parties
- Appellant
- POZ Engineering and Environmental Consulting
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- Contract No. W912K6-11-P-0024
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Advanced Constructors International, LLCNo. 58604, 58739, 58740, 58741October 8, 2015
- Capy Machine Shop, Inc.No. 59085October 8, 2015
- Capy Machine Shop, Inc.No. 59133October 8, 2015
- Areebel Engineering & LogisticsNo. 58648, 58649, 58650, 58651October 5, 2015
- Hashmat Khalil Rezai Road & Construction ComanyNo. 58868September 1, 2015
- Development & Evolution Construction Co.No. 59462September 1, 2015
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026