59045

Andy Phillips

January 19, 2016Judge Thrasher
Denied / Government PrevailedContract InterpretationAccord & Satisfaction / Release / WaiverCDA Jurisdiction

Andy Phillips appealed multiple claims alleging breach of contract related to his concessionaire contracts with an Army Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality. The Board denied all claims, finding insufficient evidence to support the allegations.

Material Facts

  • The contract was a concessionaire contract for management and operation of Tumbleweed Restaurant in Germany.
  • The contract performance period consisted of a base period of one year with four additional one-year option periods.
  • Mr. Phillips agreed to move Tumbleweed to Building 227, and the government invested over $67,000 in renovations for the new location.
  • The hardwood bar was disposed of by DPW during construction of the warrior zone after Tumbleweed moved out of Building 607.
  • Mr. Phillips purchased a new cash register in September 2011, but there was no evidence that the government breached its duty to provide one.

Parties

Appellant
Andy Phillips
Respondent Agency
Army Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality
Contract Number
NAFZUI-06-T-0231
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.