59206

Abdul Ahad Khadim Construction Company

August 7, 2014Judge Lopes
DismissedCDA JurisdictionAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Abdul Ahad Khadim Construction Company appealed the government's dismissal of its claim for lack of jurisdiction due to failure to certify the claim. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded firm fixed-price Contract No. W91B4L-12-C-0214 to the appellant for the construction of a road and entry control point at Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan.
  • The estimated value of the contract was $201,232.
  • The contract incorporated the FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES clause and included the FAR 52.211-12, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES clause.
  • The government issued a notice to proceed on 1 September 2012, with a contract completion date of 30 October 2012.
  • The contracting officer expressed concern over the appellant's lack of progress on the contract work on 17 October 2012.
  • The government issued several contract modifications extending the completion date due to delays caused by the appellant.
  • On 1 October 2013, the government assessed $27,045.60 in liquidated damages due to delays caused by the appellant.
  • On 2 February 2014, the appellant filed a claim for AFN 16,508,044.80, which was for $339,513.82, but it was not certified.
  • The contracting officer issued a final decision granting the appellant's claim for liquidated damages but denying the remainder of the claim.

Parties

Appellant
Abdul Ahad Khadim Construction Company
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W91B4L-12-C-0214
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.