Abdul Ahad Khadim Construction Company
Abdul Ahad Khadim Construction Company appealed the government's dismissal of its claim for lack of jurisdiction due to failure to certify the claim. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss the appeal without prejudice.
Material Facts
- The government awarded firm fixed-price Contract No. W91B4L-12-C-0214 to the appellant for the construction of a road and entry control point at Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan.
- The estimated value of the contract was $201,232.
- The contract incorporated the FAR 52.233-1, DISPUTES clause and included the FAR 52.211-12, LIQUIDATED DAMAGES clause.
- The government issued a notice to proceed on 1 September 2012, with a contract completion date of 30 October 2012.
- The contracting officer expressed concern over the appellant's lack of progress on the contract work on 17 October 2012.
- The government issued several contract modifications extending the completion date due to delays caused by the appellant.
- On 1 October 2013, the government assessed $27,045.60 in liquidated damages due to delays caused by the appellant.
- On 2 February 2014, the appellant filed a claim for AFN 16,508,044.80, which was for $339,513.82, but it was not certified.
- The contracting officer issued a final decision granting the appellant's claim for liquidated damages but denying the remainder of the claim.
Parties
- Appellant
- Abdul Ahad Khadim Construction Company
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91B4L-12-C-0214
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Commissioning Solutions Global, LLCNo. 59254August 7, 2014
- Alenia North America, Inc.No. 57935August 7, 2014
- Pros CleanersNo. 59067August 6 ,2014
Same Year
- Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Fluor CorporationNo. 59367, 59697December 24, 2014
- The Boeing CompanyNo. 59216December 24, 2014
- Government Services Corp.No. 59654December 23, 2014
- Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59432December 23, 2014
- CAE USA, Inc.No. 58957December 23, 2014
- Metal Storm, Inc.No. 58901December 23, 2014
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026