5935759358

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

August 13, 2015Judge Delman
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedContract InterpretationStatutory Compliance

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. sought partial summary judgment establishing the government's contractual obligation to indemnify it for third-party Sodium Dichromate claims and related legal costs. The Board held that the indemnification provisions were unambiguous and granted the motion as to entitlement.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded KBRSI a cost-reimbursement, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract for Iraqi oil infrastructure restoration and related support services.
  • The contract incorporated FAR 52.250-1, Alternate I, the White Memo, and Enclosure A defining unusually hazardous risks.
  • Task Order No. 0003 directed KBRSI to repair oil wells, pipelines, pump stations, and associated infrastructure, including the Qarmat Water Treatment Plant.
  • Sodium Dichromate was present in powder form in the soil and other areas of the plant.
  • Personnel at the plant were exposed to Sodium Dichromate by touch or inhalation over a period of time.
  • Sodium Dichromate contains hexavalent chromium and was described as toxic and carcinogenic.
  • KBRSI encapsulated Sodium Dichromate at certain plant locations, and plant operations were later shut down for a period because of personnel exposure and related testing.
  • Military personnel filed claims against KBRSI alleging injuries from exposure to Sodium Dichromate at the plant.
  • KBRSI defended the lawsuits and incurred outside legal costs.
  • The government denied KBRSI's indemnification requests and did not pay invoices for some of the outside legal costs.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Contract Number
DACA63-03-D-0005
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.