59557

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

January 22, 2015Judge O'Sullivan
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedCost Allowability / Allocability (FAR 31)Cost Accounting Standards (CAS)DCAA InvolvedDCMA InvolvedCAS at Issue

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. appealed a contracting officer's final decision concerning the allowability of subcontractor Defense Base Act insurance costs and moved to require the government to file the complaint. The Board granted the motion because the final decision and audit report did not articulate the basis for treating the incurred costs as unallowable.

Material Facts

  • The LOGCAP Support Contract was awarded to KBR, then known as Brown & Root Services, on 14 December 2001.
  • The contract required KBR to provide workers' compensation insurance for its employees and to flow down that requirement to subcontractors.
  • KBR provided DBA insurance for subcontractors because insurance might not be easily accessible in the areas where the contract work was performed.
  • Subcontractor DBA premiums were based on estimated payroll, and KBR did not reimburse itself through subcontractor billings for those premiums.
  • KBR's FY 2007 incurred cost proposal included subcontractor DBA insurance premiums.
  • DCAA's audit stated that KBR did not true up subcontractor DBA insurance costs based on actual subcontractor labor and questioned the costs using a 43 percent decrement.
  • The audit also stated that DCAA verified invoices, installment payments, competitive quotes, and valid insurance policies, and that the premium was reasonable.
  • The ACO's final decision stated that the billed cost was not based on actual subcontractor labor incurred during FY 2007.
  • The final decision referenced and relied upon the DCAA audit report and KBR's response.

Parties

Appellant
Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
DAAA09-02-D-0007
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.