Equine Architectural Products, Inc.
Equine Architectural Products, Inc. appealed a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction regarding a claim under Contract No. W91ZLK-12-P-0037. The Board dismissed the appeal due to the absence of a claim submitted in a sum certain.
Material Facts
- The government awarded Contract No. W91ZLK-12-P-0037 to Equine Architectural Products, Inc. for demolition and removal of railroad facilities.
- The government issued a Stop-Work Order to the appellant by Modification No. P00002 dated 25 July 2012.
- The contract was terminated for convenience approximately 51 days after the Stop-Work Order.
- Appellant submitted a termination proposal to the government by cover letter dated 21 December 2012.
- On 7 January 2014, appellant submitted a claim letter to the government but did not provide a sum certain.
- Subsequent communications included an email on 28 January 2014 estimating the value of scrap at approximately $6,986,832.00.
- On 7 May 2014, appellant's counsel stated total claims of $9,250,000.00 but did not certify this amount.
- Appellant filed a notice of appeal on a 'deemed denial' basis on 12 December 2014, stating total losses exceeded $10,000,000.00.
- The contracting officer denied appellant's claim on 15 December 2014.
Parties
- Appellant
- Equine Architectural Products, Inc.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91ZLK-12-P-0037
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59357, 59358August 29, 2016
- GSC Construction, Inc.No. 59644, 59956, 60069, 60070, 60112, 60113June 21, 2016
- Access Personnel Services, Inc.No. 59900June 15, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026