Black Tiger Company
Black Tiger Company appealed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction regarding a contract dispute with the Army. The Board denied the government's motion, establishing jurisdiction based on the appellant's assertion of a contract.
Material Facts
- On 5 February 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Board alleging that it has not been paid for equipment it provided to the Army.
- The notice of appeal included an exchange of emails concerning appellant's request for payment and a CDA certification dated 3 February 2015.
- The government moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on 12 March 2015, alleging that there is no evidence that the contract identified by appellant actually exists.
- The government concluded that appellant filed a properly certified claim on 3 February 2015.
- The ACC-RI CO averred that he had searched various government contract retrieval and archival systems but had been unable to find any information related to the contract documents submitted by appellant.
Parties
- Appellant
- Black Tiger Company
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91GXE-11-P-0083
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Patriot Construction, LLCNo. 63087-ADR, 63205-ADRMay 15, 2025
- Red River Science & Technology, LLCNo. 63785April 22, 2025
- Teledyne Scientific & Imaging, LLCNo. 62716, 62717February 19, 2025
- Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCINo. 63639June 24, 2024
- Record Steel and Construction, Inc. dba RSCINo. 63563June 24, 2024
- AVMAC LLCNo. 63747-ADRMay 24, 2024
Same Year
- Sparton DeLeon Springs, LLCNo. 60416December 28, 2016
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59873, 60885December 21, 2016
- Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, Inc.No. 59508, 59509December 20, 2016
- CDM Constructors, Inc.No. 59524December 20, 2016
- Astro Systems, Inc.No. 60769, 60781December 20, 2016
- First Division Design, LLCNo. 60884-975December 15, 2016
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026