Ahjar Shat Alarab Albidhaa Co.
Ahjar Shat Alarab Albidhaa Co. appealed a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction regarding a contract dispute with the Department of the Army. The Board denied the government's motion to dismiss, finding jurisdiction under the Contract Disputes Act.
Material Facts
- The appellant entered into a contract with the government to deliver 23 refrigerated containers at a total price of $522,100.00.
- The government contended that the contract does not exist in any government archival system.
- The appellant received a DD 250 form substantiating the delivery and acceptance of the containers in 2009.
- The appellant submitted an invoice for the full contract price on 12 July 2009.
- The appellant contacted the Army Corps of Engineers in December 2014 regarding the contract, but was informed that the contract was not issued by them.
- The appellant submitted a certified claim to the government via email on 10 December 2014, which included a signed CDA claim certification and an invoice.
- The government contended that it did not receive the appellant's 10 December 2014 email or any attachments.
Parties
- Appellant
- Ahjar Shat Alarab Albidhaa Co.
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91GY3-09-M-7846
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59357, 59358August 29, 2016
- GSC Construction, Inc.No. 59644, 59956, 60069, 60070, 60112, 60113June 21, 2016
- Access Personnel Services, Inc.No. 59900June 15, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
- CI², Inc.No. 59948June 6, 2016
Same Year
- Lawn Legends LLCNo. 59078December 30, 2015
- Soluciones Especializadas de Transporte S.A.No. 58579December 29, 2015
- First Transit, Inc.No. 59700December 22, 2015
- Xerox CorporationNo. 60117December 22, 2015
- EMTA Insaat A.S.No. 60031December 18, 2015
- Soap Creek Marina, LLCNo. 59445December 18, 2015
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026