60119

DynPort Vaccine Company LLC

September 30, 2015Judge Hartman
Denied / Government PrevailedCDA JurisdictionInspection / Acceptance / Warranty / Latent Defects

DynPort Vaccine Company LLC appealed six unilateral contract modifications directing no-cost corrective work under an inspection clause. The Board denied the Army's motion to dismiss, holding that the modifications constituted final decisions on government claims despite the contracting officer's subsequent letter stating that no final decisions had been issued.

Material Facts

  • The Army awarded DynPort Vaccine Company LLC a cost-reimbursement, cost-sharing, award-fee, research and development type contract.
  • The contracting officer issued six later modifications from October 2014 through July 2015 directing DynPort to perform work at no cost to the government.
  • The six later modifications required no-cost corrective work on the identical legal and factual grounds as Modification No. P00431.
  • The contracting officer's July 31, 2015 letter stated that no contracting officer final decisions had been issued concerning the six modifications.
  • The same letter stated that the modifications were fully effective and had to be carried out as directed.
  • DynPort filed its appeal five days after the contracting officer's letter.

Parties

Appellant
DynPort Vaccine Company LLC
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contracting Agency
U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity
Contract Number
DAMDl 7-98-C-8024
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.