60366

Sauer Incorporated

November 17, 2016Judge Clarke
Partially SustainedAccord & Satisfaction / Release / Waiver

Sauer Incorporated appealed a decision regarding its claim for home office overhead under an IDIQ contract with the Navy. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss part of the appeal, ruling that the claim was not properly presented to the contracting officer.

Material Facts

  • The government and Sauer entered into IDIQ Contract No. N69450-09-D-1274 on 3 June 2009.
  • Task Order 4 was awarded to Sauer on 18 November 2009 for design and repairs to Hangar 1552 at Naval Station Mayport, Florida.
  • Sauer requested an additional $57,535 for home office overhead in a letter dated 18 June 2013.
  • The contracting officer rejected Sauer's request on 20 June 2013, stating there was no merit to the request.
  • Modification No. 17 of Task Order 4 was executed on 26 September 2013, which included a lump sum settlement of $925,000.
  • Sauer submitted a certified claim for $130,899 for unabsorbed home office overhead on 18 November 2014.
  • The government denied Sauer's certified claim by a contracting officer's final decision dated 16 September 2015.
  • Sauer's complaint included a request for $57,535 for home office overhead associated with cost increases of Mod 17.

Parties

Appellant
Sauer Incorporated
Respondent Agency
United States Navy
Contract Number
N69450-09-D-1274
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.