Sauer Incorporated
Sauer Incorporated appealed a decision regarding its claim for home office overhead under an IDIQ contract with the Navy. The Board granted the government's motion to dismiss part of the appeal, ruling that the claim was not properly presented to the contracting officer.
Material Facts
- The government and Sauer entered into IDIQ Contract No. N69450-09-D-1274 on 3 June 2009.
- Task Order 4 was awarded to Sauer on 18 November 2009 for design and repairs to Hangar 1552 at Naval Station Mayport, Florida.
- Sauer requested an additional $57,535 for home office overhead in a letter dated 18 June 2013.
- The contracting officer rejected Sauer's request on 20 June 2013, stating there was no merit to the request.
- Modification No. 17 of Task Order 4 was executed on 26 September 2013, which included a lump sum settlement of $925,000.
- Sauer submitted a certified claim for $130,899 for unabsorbed home office overhead on 18 November 2014.
- The government denied Sauer's certified claim by a contracting officer's final decision dated 16 September 2015.
- Sauer's complaint included a request for $57,535 for home office overhead associated with cost increases of Mod 17.
Parties
- Appellant
- Sauer Incorporated
- Respondent Agency
- United States Navy
- Contract Number
- N69450-09-D-1274
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Metal Trades, Inc.No. 62966November 2, 2021
- Powertronic Systems Florida, Inc.No. 62174October 19, 2021
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783August 5, 2021
- U.S. Pan American Solutions, LLCNo. 62629August 5, 2021
- URS Federal Support Services, Inc.No. 59998-QUANAugust 3, 2021
- G&S Carpet Mills, Inc.No. 62799June 25, 2021
Same Year
- Sparton DeLeon Springs, LLCNo. 60416December 28, 2016
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.No. 59873, 60885December 21, 2016
- Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems, Inc.No. 59508, 59509December 20, 2016
- CDM Constructors, Inc.No. 59524December 20, 2016
- Astro Systems, Inc.No. 60769, 60781December 20, 2016
- First Division Design, LLCNo. 60884-975December 15, 2016
Same Issue
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- Martin Brothers ConstructionNo. 63196, 63431September 30, 2026
- WSP USA Solutions Inc.No. 62674September 1, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026