59998-QUAN

URS Federal Support Services, Inc.

August 3, 2021Judge Clarke
Partially SustainedQuantum / DamagesContract Changes / Constructive Changes

URS Federal Support Services, Inc. moved for entry of judgment following an earlier decision sustaining its appeal in part and remanding the matter for negotiation of the price of a contract change. The Board granted the motion in a reduced amount after holding that URS failed to provide actual cost data and therefore failed to establish any reduction or elimination of the Air Force's offset.

Material Facts

  • The Air Force contract covered aircraft maintenance services at various locations in the United States.
  • The contract specified the number and skills of personnel required to perform the maintenance.
  • The Air Force moved five full-time-equivalent aircraft mechanics from Ft. Knox, Kentucky, and Kingsville, Texas, to Ft. Hood, Texas.
  • The personnel transfer increased costs at Ft. Hood and decreased costs at Ft. Knox and Kingsville.
  • The Air Force used URS's pricing sheets to estimate the savings resulting from the personnel reductions.
  • URS did not produce or explain its actual costs of performance at Ft. Knox and Kingsville.
  • Neither party presented the details of its calculations concerning the value of the Ft. Hood change.

Parties

Appellant
URS Federal Support Services, Inc.
Respondent Agency
Air Force
Contracting Agency
Air Force
Contract Number
FA8108-09-D-0006
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.