Green Bay Logistic Services Co.
Green Bay Logistic Services Co. appealed a termination for convenience of its contract with the Defense Contract Management Agency for the lease of trucks, claiming additional compensation. The Board denied the appeal, finding no entitlement to recovery.
Material Facts
- The government awarded the contract to Green Bay to lease two flatbed trucks for six months at a total price of $22,440.
- The contract required that the vehicles be less than three years old and have less than 75,000KM on the odometer.
- Green Bay delivered photographs of trucks that were model year 2000, which were rejected for non-compliance.
- Green Bay subsequently leased older trucks, model years 1989 and 1996, which were also rejected.
- The contracting officer issued a stop-work order and later terminated the contract for convenience.
- Green Bay submitted a settlement proposal claiming $46,800, which included costs for non-compliant vehicles.
- The TCO determined that Green Bay was not entitled to any further compensation because its percent of completion was 0%.
Parties
- Appellant
- Green Bay Logistic Services Co.
- Respondent Agency
- Defense Contract Management Agency
- Contract Number
- H92237-16-C-0030
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Visionary Construction, Inc. dba Visionary ServicesNo. 64426August 20, 2026
- Siler Excavating, LLCNo. 63715, 64180, 64181June 29, 2026
- Cutter Enterprises, LLCNo. 61020, 61021, 61061, 61146, 61278February 17, 2026
- Cobalt Technical Solutions Inc.No. 63852November 19, 2025
- Walsh Turner Joint Venture IINo. 63665May 8, 2025
- AICI-Archirodon JVNo. 62201-QUANFebruary 26, 2025
Same Year
- AT&T Corp.No. 61868December 21, 2018
- Gilbane Federal Joint VentureNo. 61590December 21, 2018
- WIT Associates, Inc.No. 61547December 19, 2018
- Avis Industries, Inc.No. 61609December 19, 2018
- Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc.No. 61209, 61210, 61211, 61212 61213, 61214December 19, 2018
- J.F. Brennan Co., Inc.No. 60737December 19, 2018
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468August 21, 2026
- Peritia LLCNo. 64495, 64586August 20, 2026
- Gibraltar-Caddell, a Joint VentureNo. 64379July 13, 2026
- VESEQU LLCNo. 64468May 21, 2026
- Northcon, Inc.No. 64343, 64417April 1, 2026