Peritia LLC
Peritia LLC challenged the Army’s for-cause termination of its Defense Travel System Administration contract. After the Army converted the termination to a convenience termination, the Board granted the government’s motion and dismissed ASBCA No. 64495 as moot without prejudice.
Material Facts
- Peritia held a contract to provide Defense Travel System Administration services for the U.S. Army at Shaw Air Force Base in Sumter, South Carolina.
- The Army terminated Peritia’s contract for cause under FAR 52.212-4(m) on March 24, 2026.
- Peritia’s challenge to the for-cause termination requested conversion to a convenience termination and further relief associated with the termination-for-convenience settlement process.
- The Army converted the for-cause termination to a convenience termination on April 14, 2026.
- The conversion notice stated that Peritia could submit a termination settlement proposal under FAR 52.212-4(l).
- Peritia submitted a termination settlement proposal designated as a certified claim.
- The Army issued a final decision on Peritia’s claim for convenience termination costs and breach damages.
- Peritia appealed the Army’s final decision in ASBCA No. 64586, which was consolidated with ASBCA No. 64495.
- Peritia argued that the conversion was a litigation-risk-avoidance strategy and that the Army’s conduct involved bad faith.
- Peritia did not allege that the Army intended to reinstate the for-cause termination.
Parties
- Appellant
- Peritia LLC
- Respondent Agency
- U.S. Army
- Contracting Agency
- Army
- Contract Number
- W51H72-25-P-A002
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- Group III Mgt, Inc.No. 64176August 26, 2026
- MicroTechnologies, LLCNo. 64544August 11, 2026
- M.A. Mortenson CompanyNo. 64072-ADRJuly 14, 2026
- Fluor-AMEC II, LLCNo. 64131June 23, 2026
- Inland Service Corporation, LLCNo. 63770May 21, 2026
- Wolverine Tube, Inc.No. 63877March 25, 2026
Same Year
- Bodell Construction CompanyNo. 63517-ADR, 63850-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Procal Electric, Inc.No. 63580-ADROctober 2, 2026
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Kearfott CorporationNo. 64328October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64606October 1, 2026
- Relyant Global, LLCNo. 64651October 1, 2026
Same Issue
- Huffman Construction, LLCNo. 62591, 62783September 30, 2026
- US Military CorpNo. 64321September 24, 2026
- Relyant Global LLCNo. 64032, 64111, 64230, 64231, 64517August 24, 2026
- Visionary Construction, Inc. dba Visionary ServicesNo. 64426August 20, 2026
- J.A.M. Construction Services, Inc.No. 63378, 64226, 64439July 28, 2026
- Vision Distributors LLCNo. 64357July 17, 2026