64468

VESEQU LLC

August 21, 2026Judge Sweet
Denied / Government PrevailedTermination for ConvenienceQuantum / DamagesCommercial Item

VESEQU LLC appealed a contracting officer's termination-for-convenience settlement determination under a contract for web-based subscriptions, publications, and periodicals. The Board denied the appeal because VESEQU did not prove, using its standard record keeping system and with sufficient certainty, that it incurred a loss greater than the amended settlement amount.

Material Facts

  • DLA awarded VESEQU a contract for VESEQU to acquire and make available 30 web-based subscriptions, publications, and periodicals.
  • The contract included a termination for convenience clause under FAR 52.212-4(l).
  • S&P and Bloomberg insisted that the government sign master service agreements, and VESEQU unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate license terms.
  • Disputes arose concerning the required Benchmark subscription and whether Project Blue services were required on a per-subscription or per-material basis.
  • The contracting officer issued a Stop Work Order concerning the cancelled subscriptions on October 27, 2025.
  • VESEQU's Cost Summary, request for equitable adjustment, and Substantiating Documentation asserted that VESEQU had spent 760 hours on the cancelled subscriptions.
  • VESEQU did not provide evidence from the internal time-tracking system it identified as the source of its claimed hours.
  • The discovery crosswalk allocated some claimed work to activities across the full contract and to non-cancelled subscriptions.
  • VESEQU did not submit the Bucket C Time Ledger to the Board.
  • The contracting officer's amended settlement determination calculated 69.75 hours and used an $85 hourly rate.

Parties

Appellant
VESEQU LLC
Respondent Agency
Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials
Contracting Agency
Defense Logistics Agency Strategic Materials
Contract Number
SP8000-25-C-0005
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.