61181

Black Bear Construction Company

November 14, 2017Judge Osterhout
Denied / Government PrevailedTermination for ConvenienceStatute of Limitations / Timeliness

Black Bear Construction Company appealed the denial of its claim for settlement costs following a termination for convenience of its contract. The Board denied the appeal due to the untimely submission of the claim.

Material Facts

  • The government awarded the contract to Black Bear for runway improvement on 18 May 2012.
  • The contract incorporated FAR clause 52.249-2, which included requirements for termination settlement proposals.
  • Black Bear received a notice to proceed on 28 June 2012, with a performance period of 90 days.
  • The government terminated the contract for convenience on 16 July 2012 and requested a settlement proposal within 30 days.
  • Black Bear submitted its claim letter to the contracting officer on 25 March 2017, over three years after the termination.
  • The contracting officer denied the claim on 22 May 2017, citing the late submission and a release of claims.

Parties

Appellant
Black Bear Construction Company
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W91B4L-12-C-0185
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.