Engility, LLC
Engility, LLC appealed the government's disallowance of legal-proceeding and settlement costs arising from a lawsuit alleging abuse by Engility employees at Abu Ghraib. The Board denied leave to add a prior-material-breach defense as futile but granted leave to add a defense based on breach related to the alleged abuse of the Iraqi plaintiffs or the likely merits of their claims.
Material Facts
- Engility is the successor in interest to Titan.
- Titan held and performed contracts for translation services at Abu Ghraib prison, Iraq.
- Iraqi plaintiffs sued Engility and/or Titan alleging that Engility employees participated in abuse of plaintiffs at Abu Ghraib.
- One lawsuit was defended and subsequently settled.
- The government disallowed the costs of defending and settling that lawsuit.
- The government and Engility conducted discovery concerning material provided by CENTCOM in March 2018 relating to investigations of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib.
- The discovery material consisted of approximately one-third of a terabyte of unorganized and unlabeled information that mixed unclassified and classified material.
- The underlying lawsuit involved allegations by 72 Iraqi plaintiffs.
- Engility characterized the number of detainees who passed through Abu Ghraib during its translation performance as thousands.
- The contracting officer's final decision stated that the alleged abuse was out-of-scope and constituted a breach of contract if proven.
Parties
- Appellant
- Engility, LLC
- Contract Number
- DASCO 1-99-D-OOO 1; W911 W4-04-D-0005
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- ECC International, LLCNo. 58993, 60167, 60283February 24, 2022
- ECC International, LLCNo. 60167January 25, 2022
- General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.No. 62180-ADRDecember 13, 2021
- Sungjee Construction Co., Ltd.No. 62002, 62170March 23, 2021
- General AtomicsNo. 61495January 5, 2021
- Engility LLCNo. 61281August 11, 2020
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Africa Transport Logistics CompanyNo. 64120October 1, 2026
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- U.S. Aeroteam, Inc.No. 61972, 61973August 6, 2026
- Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile SystemsNo. 59435, 59436, 59437, 59438, 60056, 60057, 60058, 60059, 60060, 60061May 14, 2026
- IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.No. 62638, 63879May 6, 2026
- CACI International, Inc.No. 63663March 10, 2026