URS Federal Services, Inc.
URS Federal Services, Inc. challenged the government's motion to dismiss on the ground that a digital signature used by its Vice President to certify a CDA claim did not satisfy the certification requirement. The Board held that the signature complied with the CDA and denied the motion.
Material Facts
- The contract was awarded to URS's predecessor on October 3, 2008.
- The contract incorporated the standard FAR Disputes clause.
- Thomas S. Walter was URS's Vice President of Contracts when the claim was submitted.
- Walter had authority to certify CDA claims on behalf of URS.
- Walter used PDF-XChange PRO software installed on his office computer to create and electronically affix the digital signature.
- The digital signature could be created on URS computers only through use of Walter's unique password and user identification.
- The claim document, including the digital signature, originated from Walter's URS email account.
- An individual outside the company's network would not normally be able to access the certificate associated with the digital signature.
- The government denied URS's claim without referring to any alleged infirmity in Walter's signature.
Parties
- Appellant
- URS Federal Services, Inc.
- Contract Number
- FA8108-09-D-0006
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- KBR Services, LLCNo. 63870, 63956August 24, 2026
- AeroKool Aviation CorporationNo. 64377August 24, 2026
- Kropp Holdings, Inc.No. 64523August 24, 2026
- BFBC, LLCNo. 64509August 18, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.No. 64438July 30, 2026
Same Year
- Club Car, Inc.No. 61710December 30, 2019
- Universal Service Provider, LLCNo. 62021December 23, 2019
- Technica CorporationNo. 62160December 20, 2019
- AXXON International, LLCNo. 61224, 61268, 61625December 20, 2019
- Naseem Al-Oula CompanyNo. 61321, 61322, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326December 20, 2019
- Ford Lumber & Building Supply, Inc.No. 61618December 18, 2019
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026