61443

URS Federal Services, Inc.

October 3, 2019Judge Prouty
Denied / Government PrevailedCDA JurisdictionStatutory Compliance

URS Federal Services, Inc. challenged the government's motion to dismiss on the ground that a digital signature used by its Vice President to certify a CDA claim did not satisfy the certification requirement. The Board held that the signature complied with the CDA and denied the motion.

Material Facts

  • The contract was awarded to URS's predecessor on October 3, 2008.
  • The contract incorporated the standard FAR Disputes clause.
  • Thomas S. Walter was URS's Vice President of Contracts when the claim was submitted.
  • Walter had authority to certify CDA claims on behalf of URS.
  • Walter used PDF-XChange PRO software installed on his office computer to create and electronically affix the digital signature.
  • The digital signature could be created on URS computers only through use of Walter's unique password and user identification.
  • The claim document, including the digital signature, originated from Walter's URS email account.
  • An individual outside the company's network would not normally be able to access the certificate associated with the digital signature.
  • The government denied URS's claim without referring to any alleged infirmity in Walter's signature.

Parties

Appellant
URS Federal Services, Inc.
Contract Number
FA8108-09-D-0006
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.