Sea Cycle Construction Company
Sea Cycle Construction Company appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for payment under a construction contract. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a required certification.
Material Facts
- The Army awarded Contract No. W91B4L-10-C-0229 to Sea Cycle Construction Company for construction work in Afghanistan.
- The contract required the appellant to commence performance within 5 calendar days after receipt of notice to proceed and complete the work no later than 60 days from the date of receiving the notice.
- The Army notified the appellant that it would pursue a no-cost cancellation of the contract due to the appellant's failure to begin performance as required.
- The Army cancelled the contract in its entirety through a modification dated August 11, 2010.
- The appellant submitted a claim seeking payment of $342,590 for inventory purchased in preparation for performing the contract.
- The claim did not include a signed statement with the certification language required for claims exceeding $100,000.
- The contracting officer denied the claim because the appellant failed to file a certified claim within the CDA six-year statute of limitations.
Parties
- Appellant
- Sea Cycle Construction Company
- Respondent Agency
- Department of the Army
- Contract Number
- W91B4L-10-C-0229
Full Legal Analysis
Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.
Holding & Legal Reasoning
The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.
Issues Presented
Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.
Quantum & Recovery
The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.
Verified Authorities & Citations
Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.
Practitioner Takeaways
Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.
Similar Cases
Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.
Citation Graph
An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.
Related Decisions
Same Judge
- KBR Services, LLCNo. 63870, 63956August 24, 2026
- AeroKool Aviation CorporationNo. 64377August 24, 2026
- Kropp Holdings, Inc.No. 64523August 24, 2026
- BFBC, LLCNo. 64509August 18, 2026
- Mvation Worldwide Inc.No. 64633August 18, 2026
- Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.No. 64438July 30, 2026
Same Year
- AT&T Corp.No. 61868December 21, 2018
- Gilbane Federal Joint VentureNo. 61590December 21, 2018
- WIT Associates, Inc.No. 61547December 19, 2018
- Avis Industries, Inc.No. 61609December 19, 2018
- Tetra Tech Tesoro, Inc.No. 61209, 61210, 61211, 61212 61213, 61214December 19, 2018
- J.F. Brennan Co., Inc.No. 60737December 19, 2018
Same Issue
- Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling SupportNo. 61612September 22, 2026
- Wild Hare Haulers, LLCNo. 64596, 64597, 64598September 15, 2026
- Hensel Phelps Construction CompanyNo. 64327September 14, 2026
- Bahadir Construction Engineering Contracting & Trading Inc. Co. and Impreza Costruzioni Giuseppe Maltauro S.p. A Joint VentureNo. 64038, 64336, 64428September 9, 2026
- VAE, Inc.No. 64437, 64464, 64465September 9, 2026
- Dubai Pearl CompanyNo. 64444August 26, 2026