61671

Sea Cycle Construction Company

October 15, 2018Judge Prouty
DismissedCDA Jurisdiction

Sea Cycle Construction Company appealed a contracting officer's final decision denying its claim for payment under a construction contract. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a required certification.

Material Facts

  • The Army awarded Contract No. W91B4L-10-C-0229 to Sea Cycle Construction Company for construction work in Afghanistan.
  • The contract required the appellant to commence performance within 5 calendar days after receipt of notice to proceed and complete the work no later than 60 days from the date of receiving the notice.
  • The Army notified the appellant that it would pursue a no-cost cancellation of the contract due to the appellant's failure to begin performance as required.
  • The Army cancelled the contract in its entirety through a modification dated August 11, 2010.
  • The appellant submitted a claim seeking payment of $342,590 for inventory purchased in preparation for performing the contract.
  • The claim did not include a signed statement with the certification language required for claims exceeding $100,000.
  • The contracting officer denied the claim because the appellant failed to file a certified claim within the CDA six-year statute of limitations.

Parties

Appellant
Sea Cycle Construction Company
Respondent Agency
Department of the Army
Contract Number
W91B4L-10-C-0229
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.