61775

Northrop Grumman Corporation

April 16, 2021Judge Prouty
Sustained / Appellant PrevailedQuantum / DamagesDCMA Involved

Northrop Grumman Corporation appealed under a contract identified in the decision after the Board had sustained the appeal and remanded the matter for calculation of quantum. Following the parties' agreement and joint stipulation, the Board entered a consent judgment sustaining the appeal and awarding the stipulated amount, subject to the stated Contract Disputes Act interest terms.

Material Facts

  • Northrop Grumman Corporation was the appellant under Contract No. FA8620-13-D-3014 et al.
  • The Board's October 7, 2020 decision sustained the appeal in whole and remanded it to the parties to calculate quantum.
  • The parties subsequently agreed upon the proper figure for the award.
  • The parties submitted a joint stipulation requesting entry of judgment in the agreed amount.
  • The parties stipulated that $61,841,597.45 was the principal amount of the claim.
  • The balance of the judgment above the principal amount represented already-incurred Contract Disputes Act interest.

Parties

Appellant
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Respondent Agency
Defense Contract Management Agency
Contract Number
FA8620-13-D-3014 et al.
Open Official Decision PDF (asbca.mil)AI-analyzed, grounded in the decision text. Verify against the official PDF before relying on it.

Full Legal Analysis

Create a free account to read the complete grounded legal brief for this decision, including the holding, every issue the Board decided, quantum, verified citations, and the case's citation graph.

Holding & Legal Reasoning

The Board's holding, background, and procedural posture for this decision.

Issues Presented

Every issue the Board decided, with its determination, reasoning, and supporting authority.

Quantum & Recovery

The claimed, awarded, and net dollar amounts at issue, itemized where the record supports it.

Verified Authorities & Citations

Every cited FAR, DFARS, CAS, and case-law authority, cross-checked against the source text.

Practitioner Takeaways

Practical guidance for contractors and counsel, distilled from the Board's ruling.

Similar Cases

Related decisions surfaced by semantic search across the full analyzed corpus.

Citation Graph

An interactive graph of this case's cited authorities, judge, agency, and related decisions.

Related Decisions

Same Judge

Same Year

Same Issue

Newsletter

New decisions every Monday

GovConDash Weekly lists the decisions GAO, the boards, the courts and SBA OHA released that week, alongside the FAR Overhaul deviations and proposed rules that reach every contractor. Free.

Free, weekly, and one click to unsubscribe. We send a confirmation email first. See our Privacy Policy.